Autosite Home Your Key to Automotive Research
Autosite HomeNew car and truck prices, reviews, pictures, forums and researchBuy used cars and trucksCar finance and research, car loans and leases, auto loan calculators
Free car and truck dealer quotes Car and truck reviews and ratingsCar and truck videosCar and truck pictures, photo gallery and videosCar and truck forums, car and truck discussions

2006 Chevrolet HHR First Drive
Design

» Get Pricing
» Get Email Updates

» Get Consumer Ratings
» Read More Reviews

» Send a Letter
» More Auto News
   CarTV Video
 

» Introduction
» Model Mix
» Nuts and Bolts
» Design
» Safety and Storage
» Driving Impressions
» Wrap-Up
» Specifications

 
TO THE POINT Selling Points: Fun to drive, decent value, optional side-curtain airbags
Deal Breakers: Less power, less space, less quality than Chrysler PT Cruiser; been-there-done-that styling; no AWD or stability control
Our Advice: This clone of the Chrysler PT Cruiser comes about five years too late, but as a fun and funky small wagon, the HHR works.

MEET THE COMPETITION Chrysler PT Cruiser
Toyota Matrix
HHR vs. PT Cruiser

Click to enlarge. 2006 Chevrolet HHR

Design Once inside, the HHR again falters when compared with the PT Cruiser. Despite a 7.4-inch advantage in overall length and a 2-inch edge in width, the HHR offers less rear head and legroom than the Chrysler.

GM designers say the 2006 Chevrolet HHR was penned to resemble a 1949 Suburban, but the resemblance to Chrysler’s PT Cruiser is unmistakable, especially from the front end. Bryan Nesbitt made design decisions for the HHR, the same person who, while working at Chrysler, styled the PT Cruiser.

Like those of the Chrysler, the HHR’s wheelwells flare substantially into the front and rear doors. Both feature headlights set into the front fenders, although the HHR’s illuminators rest a bit lower. A bulging hood acts as a kind of snout, expanding as it progresses rearward like a post-WWII model. Around back, the HHR’s taillights reside in the body, while Chrysler places them in the back of the fenders. The PT Cruiser also has a much more noticeable wedge shape, whereas the HHR appears level, upright and planted.

Once inside, the HHR again falters when compared with the PT Cruiser. Despite a 7.4-inch advantage in overall length and a 2-inch edge in width, the HHR offers less rear head and legroom than the Chrysler. With 40.9 inches of rear legroom the PT outguns the HHR by 1.4 inches, and the 39.5 inches of rear headroom in the Chrysler bests the Chevy by 0.5 inches. Front headroom in the Chevy is slightly better – 39.6 compared to 39.2 inches – and front legroom is even at 40.6 inches. Chrysler also trumps Chevy in terms of cargo capacity, as the PT offers 64.2 cubic feet to the HHR’s 63.1, with the front passenger chair and rear seats folded flat.

Comparatively, a Scion xB offers more front headroom, rear headroom, and front seat legroom than the HHR and PT Cruiser, in a much smaller package at 155.3 inches in length. At 169.3 inches long, Honda’s Element provides more front headroom and legroom, but less space in the back seats. Cargo volume in the Element beats both domestic retro-wagons at 74.6 cubic feet.


<< Previous   Next >>
 
del.icio.us Save This Page   Digg!
 
 ADDITIONAL RESOURCES
 
» FREE Price Quote
» Still looking? Pricing, safety info, reviews and photos
» Share your  thoughts or see what others are saying about the Chevrolet HHR in AutoSite.com Forums
 
 
 SEARCH
 
SHOPPING TOOLS
» Auto Insurance Quotes
» Get Auto Financing
» Free Credit Reports
» Vehicle History Reports


or

or

or

or
BUILD AND PRICE

 
A D V E R T I S E M E N T